S. Müller 2010 12: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus RMG-Wiki
Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche
(Klausur)
(Klausur)
Zeile 40: Zeile 40:
  
 
12.00 Uhr  Franziska Rieger und ?
 
12.00 Uhr  Franziska Rieger und ?
 +
 +
  
 
'''Dialogue'''
 
'''Dialogue'''
Zeile 60: Zeile 62:
  
 
*Compromise:  
 
*Compromise:  
IF asked for you might have to come up with a compromise
+
 
 +
IF asked for you might have to come up with a compromise.
 +
 
 
If not, you are free to to end the conversation as you please
 
If not, you are free to to end the conversation as you please
  

Version vom 20. Juni 2011, 18:20 Uhr


Inhaltsverzeichnis

Klausur

June 30, 2011 and July,1 2011: Oral Exams

Timetable for oral exams (Reihenfolge wurde ausgelost)

Thursday June 30, 2011

9.00 Uhr Johannes Bettinger und Matthias Köhler

9.30 Uhr Ina Herrmann und Judith Dorsch

10.15 Uhr Helénè Thomè und Anna- Theresa Blasl

10.45 Uhr Jan Leykauf und Maik Höhn

11.30 Uhr Richard Kohl und Thomas Schmitt

12.00 Uhr Ann- Kathrin Glöckner und Theresa Dünninger


Friday July 1, 2011

8.00 Uhr Christoph Wolfschmidt und Christopher Wittke

8.30 Uhr Nadine Rippstein und Toni Urbanski

9.00 Uhr Lena Dürbeck und Sandra Heimrich

9.45 Uhr Larissa Martin und Janine Krappmann

10.15 Uhr Eva Grümpel und Lea Michels

10.45 Uhr Eva Helbig und Veronika Gonnert

11.30 Uhr Johanna Hümmer und Clara Fischer

12.00 Uhr Franziska Rieger und ?


Dialogue


  • Introduction:

You greet each other and introduce the topic (e.g. I have recently read in a newspaper article, Last night a watched a program on TV which..., Have you aver thought about the fact that....?, etc.)


  • Discussion:

- You present your arguments: present your thesis and explain it (you might even present an example)

  • BUT do NOT list your arguments
  • LISTEN to your partner and respond to his/her arguments
  • The parts of the dialogue should be linked (logically)
  • Do NOT be rude (you can interrupt your partner BUT do not do this continuously)


  • Compromise:

IF asked for you might have to come up with a compromise.

If not, you are free to to end the conversation as you please



Analysis of a cartoon (example) Cartoon

Publisher:

This cartoon from kirktoons.com from the year 2004 was published on the website of the Humanistischer Pressedienst.

Description:

In this cartoon you can see three people. Two of them are men, who are wearing old- fashioned black and white clothes and hats,and they are standing in a dark room talking. One of them says that you just don't get intelligence like that without torture while pointing at the third person, who is a woman. She is shackled to a wheel which is attached to the roof of the room and turning above an open fire. In the speech bubble above her head she admits to being a witch. In the background you can see a flight of stairs leading up, which suggests that this room is in a basement, probably a torture room.

Analysis:

The clothes of the people depicted are typical of what Puritans were wearing in the 17th century. This is supported by the fact that the woman is "tested" to find out whether she is a witch, which refers to the Salem witch trials in the late 17th century. During this time especially women were often accused of being a witch. In order to find out whether they had magical powers they were subjected to cruel tests which they either survived, which proved them to be a witch, or during witch they died, which was proof of their innocence. The cartoonist wants to refer to a growing number of Christian Americans who agree to torture to get information from suspects. The US government has used several torture techniques like waterboarding to get information from assumed terrorsits who had been imprisoned in Guantanamo Bay. A survey has shown that most people are in favour of using torture to get information despite their religious convictions. The cartoonist wants to show the parallels to the Salem witch trials which have been proven to accuse people wrongly. The cartoon wants to remind people of this fact and show that it is not Christian to approve of torture but actually the opposite of what Jesus taught in the New Testament. So it uncovers, in a rather funny way, the hypocrisy of many US Americans who consider themselves to be Christian.

Topic:

So the topic of this cartoon is the influence of religion in the USA and its sometimes negative effects on politics.

(You can talk about the topic either at beginning, after the description of at the end of the analysis as it might sometimes be difficult to understand the topic right from the start.

Books

Please READ this book until September 13, 2011:

A Star Called Henry Klett ISBN: 978-3-12-579852-6

Presentations

June/July

Gandhi (Friday, July 8, 2011)

Bollywood (Wednesday, July 13, 2011)

NEWS Presentations

Wednesday, June 10, 2011: Hélène Thomé

Nach den Pfingstferien:

Wednesday, June 29,2011: Toni Urbanski

Wednesday, July 6, 2011: Christopher Wittke

Wednesday, July 13, 2011: Christoph Wolfschmidt

Wednesday, July 27,2011: Clara Fischer

News presentation gives information on THREE important news items from the English speaking world. If the news of of global relevance you may

include it in your presentation. The presentation should be no longer than 5-8 minutes and include pictures.

You might find these websites useful for your research.

USA

CNN

CBS News

USA Today

New York Times

Great Britain

London Times

The Guardian

BBC

Australia

General news

Sydney Morning Herald

Canada

General news

CTV News television

Ottawa Citizen

Ethnic Diversity

USA

Slavery in the USA

The Underground Railroad

Virtual Escape "on" the Underground Railroad

Civil Rights Movement Videos

Abraham Lincoln Biography

Separate But not Equal- Segregation

King Leads March on Washington

JibJab


GREAT BRITAIN

Early British History: from Celts to the Norman Conquest in 1066 Facts Sheet

The British Empire Datei:InfoGB.doc

Religion

Religious groups in the United States of AmericaMedia:denominations.doc

Scientology Scientology Worksheet

SOUTH PARK "Trapped in the Closet" Episode

Death of a Salesman

Reading instructions

  • Describe the setting of the play by Arthur Miller (Where? When?)Helpful information on "setting"
  • Characterize: Biff and Happy Loman (appearance, attitude towards work and towards their father, past experiences)
  • Describe Linda's relationship with her husband Willy