Analysis: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Aus RMG-Wiki
K (→Line of argument/argumentative structure) |
K (→IRONY) |
||
| (4 dazwischenliegende Versionen von einem Benutzer werden nicht angezeigt) | |||
| Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
==Reading and Marking== | ==Reading and Marking== | ||
* [http://www.reslife.net/assets/docs/Reading_and_Marking.doc Reading and Marking techniques - SQ3R Method] | * [http://www.reslife.net/assets/docs/Reading_and_Marking.doc Reading and Marking techniques - SQ3R Method] | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| Zeile 13: | Zeile 7: | ||
* '''Types of Irony and their Functions''' | * '''Types of Irony and their Functions''' | ||
| − | :* '''verbal irony''': express something by saying the opposite | + | :* '''verbal irony''': express something by saying the opposite |
| + | :: ⇒ effect: reader enjoys finding irony, discovers real meaning and contrast between what is said and what is meant | ||
<blockquote style="border: 1px solid grey; padding: 1em;"> | <blockquote style="border: 1px solid grey; padding: 1em;"> | ||
Oh thank you VERY MUCH for not inviting me to the party! | Oh thank you VERY MUCH for not inviting me to the party! | ||
| Zeile 20: | Zeile 15: | ||
:* '''dramatic irony''': the reader or the audience know more than the characters | :* '''dramatic irony''': the reader or the audience know more than the characters | ||
| − | :: | + | :: ⇒ effect 1: readers feel superior, because they know more, only to be soon shown they are not ⇒ readers are taught a lesson |
| − | :: | + | :: ⇒ effect 2: readers feel pity, find it hard to bear the tension and have to see the main character making fatal mistakes ... ⇒ involvement in story |
<blockquote style="border: 1px solid grey; padding: 1em;"> | <blockquote style="border: 1px solid grey; padding: 1em;"> | ||
| Zeile 31: | Zeile 26: | ||
(Lars Elleström, Divine Madness. Bucknell Univ. Press, 2002) | (Lars Elleström, Divine Madness. Bucknell Univ. Press, 2002) | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==Line of argument/argumentative structure== | ==Line of argument/argumentative structure== | ||
Aktuelle Version vom 17. November 2017, 09:42 Uhr
Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Reading and Marking
IRONY
- Types of Irony and their Functions
- verbal irony: express something by saying the opposite
- ⇒ effect: reader enjoys finding irony, discovers real meaning and contrast between what is said and what is meant
Oh thank you VERY MUCH for not inviting me to the party!
- dramatic irony: the reader or the audience know more than the characters
- ⇒ effect 1: readers feel superior, because they know more, only to be soon shown they are not ⇒ readers are taught a lesson
- ⇒ effect 2: readers feel pity, find it hard to bear the tension and have to see the main character making fatal mistakes ... ⇒ involvement in story
In a play the characters listen to a man explaining enthusiastically that he will travel to the USA on board of an absolutely unsinkable ship - the Titanic!
- irony of situation: sharp contrast between what the characters/readers wish/intend and what real life/the situation is like.
An example would be a man who takes a step aside in order to avoid getting sprinkled by a wet dog, and falls into a swimming pool." (Lars Elleström, Divine Madness. Bucknell Univ. Press, 2002)
Line of argument/argumentative structure
- describe what the author does (e.g. he puts forward his main thesis, he asks a question, he creates a contrast, he gives examples ...)
- explain why he does it at this point ( ... in orfder to show/convince/underlien/defend ..)
- show how he tries to do this effectively (rhetorical devices, argumentation ...)
