homework: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
(→Older Homework) |
K |
||
(81 dazwischenliegende Versionen von 5 Benutzern werden nicht angezeigt) | |||
Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
<div style="margin:0; border:1px solid #C00000; padding: 0em 1em 1em 1em; background-color:#FFFFFF; align:left;"> | <div style="margin:0; border:1px solid #C00000; padding: 0em 1em 1em 1em; background-color:#FFFFFF; align:left;"> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | ='''Latest Homework '''= | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | * Describe and analyze '''[http://media.caglecartoons.com/media/cartoons/6/2007/07/12/39909_600.jpg this cartoon]'''! | |
− | + | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
+ | ='''Recent Homework'''= | ||
+ | 1. "Man is the measure of all things." | ||
+ | What is your opinion on this statement that Krauthammer bases his argument upon? | ||
+ | 2. Protecting the environment while maximizing profits - an insolvable conflict? | ||
+ | '''If your first name begins with A - K ==><BR>''' | ||
− | + | The pell-mell pursuit of profits by businesses has long been a major source of pollution. But could such greed be used instead to help preserve the environment? A growing number of politicians and economists think so, and they have come up with the idea of allowing companies to buy and sell the "right" to pollute as part of a plan to encourage them to clean up their operations. | |
− | + | ||
+ | Ultimately, there could be a national or even global market that would treat pollution permits like stocks and bonds. The strategy is not so strange as it sounds; the Environmental Protection Agency used it in the 1970s to curb pollution in selected cities. President George Bush made trading pollution rights the centerpiece of his plan to combat acid rain across the U.S., with his proposal attracting an ideologically diverse band of supporters, from conservative economists, who despised standard types of Government regulations, to environment-minded legislators, who were ready for a fresh approach to pollution control. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''If your first name begins with L - Z ==><BR>''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Under Bush's plan, the Government would set a national limit on emissions of sulfur dioxide, a prime cause of acid rain. But, instead of dictating how to meet the target, the Government would let the marketplace determine the cheapest, most efficient way to get the job done. Each company would be allotted an acceptable level of SO2 production, amounting to its fair share of the national limit. If a company managed to pollute less than its share, it could receive permits representing the shortfall, which it could sell to firms that could not meet their target. That is where the power of greed comes in: companies would have an enormous incentive to cut their emissions so they could profit from peddling their surplus permits. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Even the most enthusiastic advocates admitted right from the start that a market in pollution rights presented an immense challenge, mainly due to the difficulty of making sure companies had enough legal permits to cover all their pollution. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,969366-2,00.html | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''Translation:''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | The war in Iraq is the direct result of the work of US city-planners in the mid-1920s and it was inevitable - not because of weapons of mass destruction, as claimed by the political right, nor because of western imperialism, as claimed by the left. The undeniable cause of this war and the ones to follow it, is America’s love affair with cars. | ||
+ | |||
+ | In the early 19th century buses replaced trams, and then cars replaced buses, while General Motors bought up the last tramways to close them down. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Cars offered an escape from dirty, crowded cities to leafy garden-suburbs, with the freeways serving as escape routes. So America turned itself into a nation of home-owners living in vast suburbs spread so widely that servicing them economically with public transport has become impossible. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Today the US transportation sector is almost totally dependent on oil, and supplies are running out. America needs oil and Saddam Hussein has been sitting on it – the second largest supply in the world. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <small>Ian Roberts, The Guardian, Saturday January 18, 2003 (adapted)</small> | ||
− | |||
---- | ---- | ||
− | |||
− | + | Answer the following questions on "What Place for God in Europe?" | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | #Why has religion become a difficult topic in Europe according to the first section of the article? (Paris) | |
+ | #Why does the question of the role of religion divide the USA and Europe according to part 2 (Enlightenment divergence) a nd 4 Philosophical Diffrences)? | ||
+ | #What is the author's position? How does this become clear? | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | '''If your first name begins with A - K ==><BR>''' | ||
− | + | * Read [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3658172.stm Religion and politics in America]! | |
− | + | * Write down 8 questions and formulate the 8 answers to be asked and answered from this article, that express the basics about religion an politics! | |
− | + | ||
+ | ---- | ||
− | + | '''If your first name begins with L - Z ==><BR>''' | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
+ | * Read [http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/guest_contributors/article5050685.ece Religion remains fundamental to US politics]! | ||
+ | * Write down 8 questions and formulate the 8 answers to be asked and answered from this article, that express the basics about religion an politics! | ||
Zeile 156: | Zeile 90: | ||
+ | * Group 1: Letters on pp. 119-120 and pp. 122 (Hilary to Philip) | ||
+ | * Group 2: Letter(s) on pp. 120-122 | ||
+ | * Group 3: Letter(s) on pp. 122-124 | ||
+ | * Group 4: Letter(s) on pp. 124-128 | ||
+ | * Group 5: Letter(s) on pp. 128-130 | ||
+ | * Group 6: Letter(s) on pp. 131-133 | ||
− | + | Look at: | |
− | * | + | * Funny passages - How are they created by the narrator? |
− | * | + | * Dramatic irony - Who knows what - who doesn't? Does reader feel pity or superiority? |
+ | * language that helps to characterize the writer? | ||
+ | * basic information in letter? | ||
+ | PLUS: | ||
− | + | 1. '''Groups 1, 2, 3: pp. 134-137:''' | |
+ | ::How do the Zapps (Desire and Morris) see Philip? | ||
+ | 2. '''Groups 4, 5, 6: pp. 137-141:''' | ||
+ | ::How do the Swallows (Philip and Hilary) see Morris? | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | ---- | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
+ | ='''Questions on Changing Places (for Thursday - TODAY!)'''= | ||
+ | * Read fom page 210 on! | ||
+ | * Answer the questions in complete, written sentences! | ||
+ | * Finish these questions as our homework for Monday! | ||
+ | # pp. 210 - 211: What does Morris feel about Rummidge and university life there? | ||
+ | # pp. 211-212 Why does Morris love the paternoster elevator? | ||
+ | # pp. 214 ("Jane Austen mumbled ...") - 215 ("the internal telephone rang") What parts of Zapp's character as a teacher/academic become visible here? | ||
+ | # pp. 216 ("the telephone rang") - 218 ("God forbid") How does Zapp's relation with Hilary develop and what is his opinion of her wish to study again? | ||
+ | # pp. 220("Ah Zapp") - 223 ("The VC broke off")? Explain Zapp's arguments and motives for suppporting Philip's career! | ||
+ | # pp. 223 ("I'm sorry Vice Chncellor") - 227 ("top of the shaft") Try to sum up this passage in about 5 - 7 sentences. | ||
+ | # pp. 227 ("Hilary wore a") - 230 ("Let's go upstairs") Why does Hilary react so strangely at first and why does she change her mind again ...? | ||
+ | # Finish this chapter and sum up the perspectives for Morris in England! Do you think he will stay? | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | + | ---- | |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | * [http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/NationalStereotypes National stereotypes] See those on Britain and the USA. | ||
+ | * [http://www.tobsy.de/?p=30 10 Stereotypes about Americans] | ||
+ | * [http://enduringamericajr.blogspot.com/2008/12/stereotyped-america.html Stereotyped America] See original article! | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | '''Prepare a short presentation (about 5 minutes) of one of these novels!''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | :Angela's Ashes | ||
+ | :The Catcher in the Rye | ||
+ | :Nineteen Eighty-Four | ||
+ | :Brave New World | ||
+ | :Changing Places | ||
+ | :The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time | ||
+ | :About a Boy | ||
+ | :Fight Club | ||
+ | :The Virgin Suicides | ||
− | |||
− | + | '''Include:''' | |
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | ||
− | + | * title, author, year of publication | |
+ | * theme/basic plot, narrator/point of view | ||
+ | * personal judgement (should we read it or not?) | ||
− | + | ="Old" Homework 2009/2010= | |
− | |||
− | + | [[LK Englisch/Thelenberg 2009 11/homework_k12| Homework K12]] | |
− | + |
Aktuelle Version vom 14. März 2011, 15:06 Uhr
Inhaltsverzeichnis |
Latest Homework
- Describe and analyze this cartoon!
Recent Homework
1. "Man is the measure of all things."
What is your opinion on this statement that Krauthammer bases his argument upon?
2. Protecting the environment while maximizing profits - an insolvable conflict?
If your first name begins with A - K ==>
The pell-mell pursuit of profits by businesses has long been a major source of pollution. But could such greed be used instead to help preserve the environment? A growing number of politicians and economists think so, and they have come up with the idea of allowing companies to buy and sell the "right" to pollute as part of a plan to encourage them to clean up their operations.
Ultimately, there could be a national or even global market that would treat pollution permits like stocks and bonds. The strategy is not so strange as it sounds; the Environmental Protection Agency used it in the 1970s to curb pollution in selected cities. President George Bush made trading pollution rights the centerpiece of his plan to combat acid rain across the U.S., with his proposal attracting an ideologically diverse band of supporters, from conservative economists, who despised standard types of Government regulations, to environment-minded legislators, who were ready for a fresh approach to pollution control.
If your first name begins with L - Z ==>
Under Bush's plan, the Government would set a national limit on emissions of sulfur dioxide, a prime cause of acid rain. But, instead of dictating how to meet the target, the Government would let the marketplace determine the cheapest, most efficient way to get the job done. Each company would be allotted an acceptable level of SO2 production, amounting to its fair share of the national limit. If a company managed to pollute less than its share, it could receive permits representing the shortfall, which it could sell to firms that could not meet their target. That is where the power of greed comes in: companies would have an enormous incentive to cut their emissions so they could profit from peddling their surplus permits.
Even the most enthusiastic advocates admitted right from the start that a market in pollution rights presented an immense challenge, mainly due to the difficulty of making sure companies had enough legal permits to cover all their pollution.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,969366-2,00.html
Translation:
The war in Iraq is the direct result of the work of US city-planners in the mid-1920s and it was inevitable - not because of weapons of mass destruction, as claimed by the political right, nor because of western imperialism, as claimed by the left. The undeniable cause of this war and the ones to follow it, is America’s love affair with cars.
In the early 19th century buses replaced trams, and then cars replaced buses, while General Motors bought up the last tramways to close them down.
Cars offered an escape from dirty, crowded cities to leafy garden-suburbs, with the freeways serving as escape routes. So America turned itself into a nation of home-owners living in vast suburbs spread so widely that servicing them economically with public transport has become impossible.
Today the US transportation sector is almost totally dependent on oil, and supplies are running out. America needs oil and Saddam Hussein has been sitting on it – the second largest supply in the world.
Ian Roberts, The Guardian, Saturday January 18, 2003 (adapted)
Answer the following questions on "What Place for God in Europe?"
- Why has religion become a difficult topic in Europe according to the first section of the article? (Paris)
- Why does the question of the role of religion divide the USA and Europe according to part 2 (Enlightenment divergence) a nd 4 Philosophical Diffrences)?
- What is the author's position? How does this become clear?
If your first name begins with A - K ==>
- Write down 8 questions and formulate the 8 answers to be asked and answered from this article, that express the basics about religion an politics!
If your first name begins with L - Z ==>
- Read Religion remains fundamental to US politics!
- Write down 8 questions and formulate the 8 answers to be asked and answered from this article, that express the basics about religion an politics!
- Group 1: Letters on pp. 119-120 and pp. 122 (Hilary to Philip)
- Group 2: Letter(s) on pp. 120-122
- Group 3: Letter(s) on pp. 122-124
- Group 4: Letter(s) on pp. 124-128
- Group 5: Letter(s) on pp. 128-130
- Group 6: Letter(s) on pp. 131-133
Look at:
- Funny passages - How are they created by the narrator?
- Dramatic irony - Who knows what - who doesn't? Does reader feel pity or superiority?
- language that helps to characterize the writer?
- basic information in letter?
PLUS:
1. Groups 1, 2, 3: pp. 134-137:
- How do the Zapps (Desire and Morris) see Philip?
2. Groups 4, 5, 6: pp. 137-141:
- How do the Swallows (Philip and Hilary) see Morris?
Questions on Changing Places (for Thursday - TODAY!)
- Read fom page 210 on!
- Answer the questions in complete, written sentences!
- Finish these questions as our homework for Monday!
- pp. 210 - 211: What does Morris feel about Rummidge and university life there?
- pp. 211-212 Why does Morris love the paternoster elevator?
- pp. 214 ("Jane Austen mumbled ...") - 215 ("the internal telephone rang") What parts of Zapp's character as a teacher/academic become visible here?
- pp. 216 ("the telephone rang") - 218 ("God forbid") How does Zapp's relation with Hilary develop and what is his opinion of her wish to study again?
- pp. 220("Ah Zapp") - 223 ("The VC broke off")? Explain Zapp's arguments and motives for suppporting Philip's career!
- pp. 223 ("I'm sorry Vice Chncellor") - 227 ("top of the shaft") Try to sum up this passage in about 5 - 7 sentences.
- pp. 227 ("Hilary wore a") - 230 ("Let's go upstairs") Why does Hilary react so strangely at first and why does she change her mind again ...?
- Finish this chapter and sum up the perspectives for Morris in England! Do you think he will stay?
- National stereotypes See those on Britain and the USA.
- 10 Stereotypes about Americans
- Stereotyped America See original article!
Prepare a short presentation (about 5 minutes) of one of these novels!
- Angela's Ashes
- The Catcher in the Rye
- Nineteen Eighty-Four
- Brave New World
- Changing Places
- The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time
- About a Boy
- Fight Club
- The Virgin Suicides
Include:
- title, author, year of publication
- theme/basic plot, narrator/point of view
- personal judgement (should we read it or not?)